...discussion of MALE PLUG for hull build......
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:59 pm
...after jamming-up tim's thread with this,,I thought I'd transfer this to it's own topic so that Chad,myself and anyone who wants,,can -have-it-out-,,and work through this idea..........
first,some background posts........
micah202 wrote:..from everything I've seen,this 'time-consuming extra-step' would save MUCH time and frustration with the build overall
Postby Chad » Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:15 am
...and full length longitudinal stringers and shear clamps, IMO.
I've given out plans for this build jig: Jig_iso.pdf
(124.82 KiB) Downloaded 8 times
...and to it I would also add some longitudinal stringers forward between f53 and 89 if I were to build again.
Micah202....
....methinks that would help,,but -nothing- like building the hull upside-down on a full frame!
...as I say,it seems like it'd be a lot of work,,but I'm sure it'd build a better boat quicker.
...sorry,no PDF's
Postby Chad » Tue Sep 11, 2012 5:06 am
Sorry, I missed your "male" jig description, and assumed you were talking female.
I can see that assembling and glassing the hull panels on an upside down jig would help create a fair hull since a builder could more easily see the fair shapes, but then what?
I think the glassed hull shell would still be very wobbly, and then you'd need a female jig to hold fair while you installed the interior. Unless you propose installing the bulkheads up into the upside hull- you first!
I think this boat's hull skins are too thin and pliable to hold a fair shape without the interior parts. I think right side up in a female jig is the only reasonable way to hold the skins fair while adding the structure that keeps it fair.
The Portland folks are reporting reasonable success with their more elaborate female jig, and my hull came out very fair (except in places where I didn't have enough support as mentioned above), so I don't think there's a big problem that needs a radical new solution. Heck, even the no-jig builders achieved fair hulls, once they realized the need to introduce some lateral curvature to the frame sides.
first,some background posts........
micah202 wrote:..from everything I've seen,this 'time-consuming extra-step' would save MUCH time and frustration with the build overall
Postby Chad » Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:15 am
...and full length longitudinal stringers and shear clamps, IMO.
I've given out plans for this build jig: Jig_iso.pdf
(124.82 KiB) Downloaded 8 times
...and to it I would also add some longitudinal stringers forward between f53 and 89 if I were to build again.
Micah202....
....methinks that would help,,but -nothing- like building the hull upside-down on a full frame!
...as I say,it seems like it'd be a lot of work,,but I'm sure it'd build a better boat quicker.
...sorry,no PDF's
Postby Chad » Tue Sep 11, 2012 5:06 am
Sorry, I missed your "male" jig description, and assumed you were talking female.
I can see that assembling and glassing the hull panels on an upside down jig would help create a fair hull since a builder could more easily see the fair shapes, but then what?
I think the glassed hull shell would still be very wobbly, and then you'd need a female jig to hold fair while you installed the interior. Unless you propose installing the bulkheads up into the upside hull- you first!
I think this boat's hull skins are too thin and pliable to hold a fair shape without the interior parts. I think right side up in a female jig is the only reasonable way to hold the skins fair while adding the structure that keeps it fair.
The Portland folks are reporting reasonable success with their more elaborate female jig, and my hull came out very fair (except in places where I didn't have enough support as mentioned above), so I don't think there's a big problem that needs a radical new solution. Heck, even the no-jig builders achieved fair hulls, once they realized the need to introduce some lateral curvature to the frame sides.